|
| Food Safety from Farm
to Table: A National Food Safety Initiative |
|
| Action: |
Based on a report to the President |
| Dated: |
May 12, 1997 |
|
|
| Summary |
|
| On May 12, 1997, Vice President Al Gore announced a five point
administration plan to strengthen and improve food safety for the American people. The
plan sets forth new steps that the Administration will take this year to strengthen food
safety and details how the $43.2 million appropriation will be used in fiscal year 1998. |
|
| The goal of this initiative is to further reduce the incidence
of foodborne illness to the greatest extent feasible. The recommendations are based on the
public health principles that the public and private sector should identify and take
preventative measures to reduce the risk of illness. Collectively, we should focus our
efforts on hazards that present the greatest risk, and should make the best use of public
and private resources. The Initiative seeks to increase collaboration between public and
private organizations and to improve coordination within the government to reach the
common goal of improving the safety of the nation's food supply. |
|
| Six agencies in the Federal Government have primary
responsibility for Food Safety; the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), the United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and
Inspection Service (USDA/FSIS), USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the USDA
Cooperative State Research\Education Service (USDA-CSREES) and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). |
|
| Early Warning System for Foodborne Disease Surveillance |
|
| The primary objective of the American System of
Public Health is to prevent disease before it occurs. America needs an effective early
warning system that can detect and stop out-breaks before they spread. Such a system would
advance the understanding of foodborne illness and help in prevention efforts. |
|
| The current public health system in the United
States has limited means to identify and track the cause of foodborne illness. To enhance
and expand foodborne disease active surveillance; |
|
- Increase from five to eight the FoodNet active surveillance sentinel sites.
- Enhance early detection of foodborne disease nationwide.
|
|
| The early warning system will enhance improved
detection of foodborne disease, to do this the plan calls for; |
|
- Modernization of public health laboratories.
- Creation of national electronic network for the comparison of organisms.
- Increased national surveillance for anti-microbial resistance of foodborne pathogens.
- Conduct surveillance of human pathogens in food in animal populations and enhance
oversight of animal feed stuffs, feeds and manures.
|
|
| Interstate Outbreak Containment & Response
Coordination |
|
| FDA, CDC, USDA, and EPA are all charged with
the responsibility of responding to outbreaks of foodborne illness. All states and many
local governments share responsibility with the Federal Government for response to such
outbreaks. When an outbreak occurs all the relevant entities must work together to
efficiently and effectively prevent deaths and minimize the number of illnesses. The
better coordinated the response the more quickly the outbreak will be contained. |
|
| Companies responsible for affected products
also a have a critical role to play. Food companies are sometimes the first to recognize
that their product is causing illness. In addition, food product recalls are voluntary,
although FDA may request a company to recall products. Federal and state agencies can
benefit from industry expertise about food products and their distribution patterns. |
|
- Improve outbreak containment through better federal, state, local coordination of the
evaluation of, and response to, the foodborne illness. All interested parties will
establish an intergovernmental group called the Foodborne Outbreak Response Coordinating
Group (FORCG), to improve the approach to interstate outbreaks of foodborne illness.
- Enhance state and local infrastructure for foodborne outbreak detection evaluation and
response coordination.
|
|
| Risk Assessment |
|
| Risk assessment provides a strong foundation
upon which efficient allocation of scarce food safety resources can be made. While obvious
severe hazards of the food supply will be addressed, risk assessment provides an objective
foundation upon which efficient allocation of scarce food safety resources can be
established. Furthermore, risk assessment plays a central role in the development of any
science-based system of preventative controls. |
|
| The recommendation of the Initiative is to
emphasize the development, testing and validation of microbiological risk assessment
methods. To do this these steps will be implemented; |
|
- Establish a Risk Assessment Consortium.
- Develop and validate exposure assessment models based on probabilistic methodology.
- Develop and validate response assessment models for use in Risk Assessment.
|
|
| Research |
|
| Food safety research is critically needed to
develop the means of identifying more rapidly and accurately foodborne hazards, and
provide the tools for regulatory enforcement. Additionally, develop effective
interventions that can be used as appropriate to prevent hazards at each step from
production to consumption. |
|
| New foodborne pathogens have emerged over the
past ten years. Other microorganisms previously thought to be innocuous, have been linked
to life threatening diseases after acquiring new viral gene and anti-microbial resistance.
Many of these organisms cannot be detected readily due to a lack of suitable methods or
their sporadic occurrences in foods. |
|
- Improved detection methods to include test methods for Campylobacter, Salmonella,
Toxoplasma, E.coli O157:H7 Cryptosporidium, Hepatitis A and Norwalk viruses.
- Understanding resistance to traditional preservation technologies.
- Understanding antibiotic drug resistance.
- Prevention techniques: pathogen avoidance, reduction and elimination.
- Food handling, distribution, and storage.
- The appropriate agency should work with industry and academia to develop and assess the
effectiveness of package sensors to alert consumers of products not stored safely.
|
|
| Improving Inspections &
Compliance |
|
| The number of inspections conducted by FDA have
decreased steadily since 1981. A FDA regulated plant is inspected on an average of once
every ten years. FDA has also relied upon the states to conduct some inspections under
contract, but that number has dropped drastically. |
|
| Moreover, because of the number of imports,
which has doubled over five years with no real increase in inspectors, a smaller
percentage of imports are inspected at entry. |
|
| Given the limited inspection coverage, FDA is
finding an increase in the number of problems. The number of products recalled for life
threatening microbial contamination has increased almost five fold since 1988. Federal
budget constraints will likely prohibit significant funding increases so FDA must find new
ways to provide adequate inspection coverage. |
|
- Enhanced development of HACCP procedures
- FDA will propose appropriate regulatory and non-regulatory options for the manufacturer
of vegetable, fruit and juice products.
- FSIS will propose appropriate regulatory and non-regulatory options for egg products.
- FSIS and FDA will publish and announce notice of proposed rule making (ANPR) in which
they will evaluate the public health, food technology and regulatory issues involved in
reducing the risk of human illness from Salmonella enteritidis in shelled eggs.
- FDA will evaluate whether to require the use of HACCP on other appropriate food
commodities.
- FSIS and FDA will evaluate expanding upon existing cooperative agreements so that FSIS
inspectors who inspect plants producing meat and non-meat foods are trained in FDA
inspection standards.
|
- Enhance the safety of foods in retail food establishments, particularly at state and
local levels
- FDA and FSIS will hold a series of meetings with state and local regulators to establish
retail program standards.
- FSIS and FDA will provide HACCP training to state and local inspectors.
|
- Enhance federal and state inspection partnerships.
|
- Enhance coverage of imported foods with specific attention to foods regulated by FDA.
- FDA will work to increase the number of mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) with
trading partners.
- FDA will initiate a federal/state communication system through which states can inform
federal agencies of problems found with imported products.
- FDA will initiate a system for accrediting private labs.
|
- Enhance safety of foods during transportation.
- FDA and FSIS published an advanced notice (ANPR) on November 22, 1996.
|
|
| Education |
|
| A part of the overall food safety initiative is
providing food safety education to a variety of audiences; consumers, public health professionals and physicians, retail food service and institutional food
preparers, veterinarians, and other personnel. |
|
- Improve consumer retail and foodservice education.
- Identify key food safety education principles to establish an expert council.
- Conduct research to identify barriers to safe food handling upon which educational
programs will be centered.
- Expand existing information systems.
- Improve veterinarian and producer education.
- Improve health professional education.
- Improve industry education in the transportation area.
|
|
| If you would like additional information or a
copy of the entire report please contact Certified Laboratories at 800-Cert-Lab. |